Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the mighty fuck around, the meek find out.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

funny how the people who claim it’s “the groups” that make it so democrats don’t win somehow seem less exercised by the people who make it possible for them to do all the good and ill they do. drafts.interfluidity.com/2023/07/26/i...

If I were the plutocracy

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

even while he is standing for reelection, he is still the sitting president.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Lina would’ve won.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

(I think "underconsumption" is a strategic choice. They want a hungry, directable population, not a secure, entitled one. That might be defensible on national capability grounds, but there are real tensions with social welfare that can result in political / legitimacy crises.)

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i think part of how they’ve succeeded is they don’t look for fine-grained, precise control. they blunder into industries by declaring them strategic. 1/

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

ambitious, conformist local government officials and state-owned banks stand-up funds and firms. then they’re at risk of having their conformity second-guessed and getting demoted or defenestrated, so they compete like hell to not be the hindmost. 2/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it’s not “technocracy”. it’s course, kind of dumb, inefficient. but it gets the most important things right, that industry and production are strategic assets that states can’t just concede to markets, and that absent competition business grows fat, foolish, and malevolent. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

similar place maybe, but likely dumb implementation. i don’t dispute (indeed it was the subject of the “skeet” that provoked us) that there are political economy traps that often lead to failure and worse of industrial policy. 1/

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

industrial policy, the “China model”, are all hard to do right. but just because a thing is hard doesn’t mean you can just not, just abstain, in a competitive world where rivals are doing hard things well. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

much of my project is how to reconcile what seems to me a plainly successful economic model with implementation in a liberal democracy.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

In about 20 years of this, that’s always been the claim. Look, they’ve gotten this far, it’s impressive, but it only works because they’re catching up from an extraordinary hole. The crisis is coming, any minute. 1/

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

I’m very fond of both Michael Pettis and Brad Setser. I got my start in the economic blogosphere in Brad’s comment section, in ~2003, when he and Nouriel Roubini were predicting China faced an imminent crisis in the RMB write-downs they would have to take on their Treasury reserves. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

well, Made in China 2025. but China is the emperor of brutal competition. have you read my six-part series? drafts.interfluidity.com/2024/09/04/i...

Income driven repayment of fixed capital

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i definitely can’t handle the terms and conditions.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the more you protect from foreign competition on strategic grounds, the more essential it is you ensure a brutally competitive industry domestically. we're usually better at the first half of that than the second, unfortunately.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“you say you are an honest person, but *have* you read the terms and conditions?”

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

they ignored us but finally we matter. bwahahaha! we are the villains of the comic books we grew up with and transformed into world dominating, endlessly derivative mass media products. whatever.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

one way to think of it is we have huge effective tariffs on pharma products *first sold elsewhere* regardless of where they are produced. it seems to me people in the US don’t love this. we maybe feel a little ripped off by comparison to our neighbors.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Grover Cleveland: “the communism of combined wealth + capital, the outgrowth of overweening cupidity and selfishness, which insidiously undermines the justice + integrity of free institutions, is not less dangerous than the communism of oppressed poverty + toil.“ via chrispeel.net/2024/11/15/t...

Link Preview: 
“The Great Tax Wars”: I just finished reading “The Great Tax Wars” by Steven R. Weisman. I was looking not for a history of general income tax, but specifically the US’s progressive income tax. This bo…

“The Great Tax Wars”

Link Preview: “The Great Tax Wars”: I just finished reading “The Great Tax Wars” by Steven R. Weisman. I was looking not for a history of general income tax, but specifically the US’s progressive income tax. This bo…
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

years from now, where you least expect it, there will be sightings of dark brandon.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

politicians draw the lesson being dickish is the superpower but it only works for a very special kind of dick.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

they call it x because it’s all of our ex.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the murderer is scandalized. “do you see? do you see? do you see what i am up against? *they mean to hang me!*” “it is i, it is me, who is the true victim here.”