for now we have achieved Artificial Colonel Intelligence.
maybe. i fear Trump stratifies the world by money, though, so Musk will be the influence he instinctually follows.
it’s a scary time. but the connections between Trump, when he talks about immigrants as vermin or poisoning the blood, or Musk when he gets into replacement theory, and fascism are undeniable. 1/
@zkat.tech "(or just a small shell script)" is my favorite parenthetical in a long while.
Trump started the policy shift against big tech they are so mad about! Biden (Kanter and Khan really just competently ran with his balls!) 1/
But Trump is transactional. They bought him off. Progressives actually believe their own line, once they were persuaded tech was a problem (antitrust, misinformation, plutocracy), they can’t be bought. 2/
For Trump its no problem to be against TikTok, then for it, against crypto, then for it, against Facebook, then for it, against Section 230, then, well, we’ll see. 3/
Musk and Yass bought Trump. It’s as simple as that. In 2016, Thiel became a prominent supporter, tech oligarchs shunned him. Now they’ve competed to bend the knee, to Trump and very explicitly to Musk. Bezos killed the WaPo Harris endorsement and talks up Musk’s supposed integrity. 4/
Musk has not only gone Trump, he’s gone Nazi. Andreeson too. Have tech oligarchs shunned him like they shunned Thiel in 2016? Can you name one? Is Apple pulling their ads from X again? 5/
one way to overcome deflation without going "welfarist" in the way Xi (misguidedly) fears would be to fix this, and finance decent public health care. healthy people who need money for food are the best workers! subsidizing high quality medical care for all would make a sizable economic stimulus!
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
history proves that while technological change does eliminate some traditional jobs, new, better, more productive jobs always emerge in the aftermath. for example, for every job AI destroys, two new jobs will be created in the guard labor sector.
it’s such a fun dance and you don’t even have to be any good at dancing!
we’d all welcome them into a more accepting community with open arms, as long their self acceptance overcomes the free floating loathing that seems to motivate much of their current political affiliation.
they’re so into this song in particular, i wonder whether that’s despite or because or in complete ignorance of the subtext of the lyric?
two Senators for zero population will be really disproportionate.
the solution to a hair-trigger abuser isn’t to tiptoe gently. democracy isn’t a binary, we are worse than we were but still better than we could be. eliminating the disproportionate power of this particular group of people, “tech”, is a big part of the proximate struggle to move forward. go hard.
[tech notebook] Syndicating RSS to Mastodon and BlueSky with feedletter https://tech.interfluidity.com/2025/01/14/syndicating-rss-to-mastodon-and-bluesky-with-feedletter/index.html
Drum lives in Irvine. He's not a Bay Area mega-NIMBY. I think it's true Ds went after tech differently. But so did Rs. Under Trump is where tech antitrust began. Trump disliked crypto his first term. 1/
Previously, both parties were friendly to Big Tech, and since Clinton, to money generally. Under Biden Ds began gently reverting towards a more egalitarian, New Deal liberalism, Republicans stayed "pro business", Trump sold tech his support, and that was enough for the industry to go Nazi. 2/
Gates is and always has been an IP maximalist, a position as conservative as they come. It's that Democrats at the time weren't challenging material conservatism, only social conservatism, that let Gates remain a Democratic and lets you describe him as liberal. 3/