the dose is the poison.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
yes, but the way the piece describes what that means, they would be. that is why the piece is weak.
but the children of diplomats are not born on embassy soil, typically. they are born over American soil, under the American flag, and still are not citizens. i deeply favor of birthright citizenship, am very glad most legal scholars think arguments for loopholes weak. but this piece is not strong.
Opinion | Soil, Not Blood, Determines U.S. Citizenship
Link Preview: Opinion | Soil, Not Blood, Determines U.S. Citizenshipthe zoomer analogue of fintwitter should be “top-tick TikTok”.
(i don’t know but i suspect @alonlevy.bsky.social does. note though these costs come with social benefits, in addition to the direct transfer to existing riders. more universal transit renders plausible other improvements and efficiencies in city life.)
yes. i think insight about relative desirability of the dollar subsists in price, not quantity. the trade deficit / cap surplus are affected by dollar desirability, but by many other things too.
it might be taken an argument for free, integrated transit rather than against free buses per se, though.
i worry, since they would lose any election in a wave, and they face significant criminal and business risks from a transfer of power, that they won’t see as their best bet manufacturing crises that they can argue foreclose the possibility of immediate term democratic transition.
i might dispute the branding of these ideas as YIMBY or “abundance”, but there’s a lot of policy wisdom in this by @resnikoff.bsky.social. 1/
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
it’s never “deregulation”. there was regulation before the reform. there will be regulation after. it’s character, not “quantity”, of regulation that determines its virtue or vice. 2/
raising money is not a legitimate function of political leaders.
“Moreover, the Biden administration had sent very clear signals that it wouldn’t tolerate a coup. Given the Brazilian military’s heavy dependence on the United States for training + advanced weapon systems, the specter of an aid cutoff from Washington was a powerful deterrent.” youtu.be/Jne9t8sHpUc
Alanis Morissette - Ironic (Official 4K Music Video)
Link Preview: Alanis Morissette - Ironic (Official 4K Music Video): YouTube video by Alanis MorissetteLoading quoted Bluesky post...
i think Dan Wang has a similar view. (it seems intuitively right to me, both are cultures that valorize hustle, both are technophilic, for better and worse both have a kind of manifest-destiny conceit.)
plenty, but not so significant as a share of population. the vast majority of us are going to try to meet our society’s norms and projected aspirations, and will feel we are living lived less than normal if we fail.
“lower” is not the right framing, because consumption isn’t scalar. “growth”, or “degrowth” are not coherent concepts, except in reference to measures that don’t capture what people imagine they do. 1/
The main good that determines whether you think the economy is good or bad is slack. How much headroom is there between what you are going to buy and what you can afford to spend. 1/
You can lose slack because your real purchasing power declines, or because your needs expand. “Needs” are largely a function of structural facts and social norms. 2/
If you model spending only as discretionary choice, treat anything beyond the most basic food and shelter as expendable, as gravy, something optional or superfluous, you will never make sense of what human beings actually experience, and the ructions of behavior that results. /fin