what would Andy Rooney say?
“There is no point in criticizing something if some law of nature means that it must be so. But there is, despite claims otherwise, no law of nature which says we have to be bastards to each other or to the species we share this world with.” @ianwelsh.bsky.social www.ianwelsh.net/we-dont-have...
love it when a university i attended 20 years ago writes to let me know they've been hacked and they've leaked my social.
Text: The deal purportedly involves "retraining the content recommendation algorithm on U.S. user data to ensure the content feed is free from outside manipulation," but given you can't trust any of the companies involved, the Trump administration, or what's left of U.S. regulators, that means absolutely nothing. Oracle will be "overseeing data protection," but that means nothing as well given Oracle is run by an authoritarian-enabling billionaire with a long history of his own privacy abuses.
we’ve been gaslighted into believing that gaslighting is a thing.
i wonder if a part of this isn’t the end of crypto idealism due to aggressive mainstreaming by an obviously corrupt and overweening state. a lot of early crypto enthusiasts really were idealists of one bent or another, of whichever bent in ways that the Trump era defiles. so why not cash out now?
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
“The average American can no more imagine the texture, habits, and routines of everyday life in a walkable urban community than they can imagine completely cutting meat out of their diet. Maybe less so.” @ad-mastro.bsky.social
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
for me the real marker of credibility is his promise to bring drug prices down 400, 500, even 600 percent. i am willing to presume all of his claims are as credible as that one.
i like to think i could have made a failure of myself no matter what my race or gender — or nationality or religion or sexual preference — had been.
have we considered prosecuting a war for whaling rights? the world once ran on whale oil and blubber. MAGA!
A great piece that explains succinctly why Congressionally defined independent agencies, far from undermining executive accountability, are prerequisite to it. by @jamellebouie.net www.nytimes.com/2025/12/17/o...
I think just verifying references exist should be a journal-level task, like copyediting, or fact-checking at a magazine. It's not expert qualitative evaluation, you don't need eminent peers to spend time on it. It's something a junior editor or administrative assistant should do, prepublication. 1/
Journals I think want to claim they add value beyond the work they extract from peer reviewers for free. If they publish nonexistent citations, I think it's hard to take those claims very seriously. 2/
(You would think domain experts would be curious abt relevant work they'd not encountered, though! So it might not speak so well of reviewers either, if fake cites get through, even tho reviewers should not be expected to methodically vet all references. But not all cites are broadly relevant.) /fin
is it a "real" journal if they didn't vet the references? isn't that a minimal editorial function?
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
The relevant unit of housing is not the unit. It's the district or neighborhood. Housing in contemporary society is not to about glorified tents, just to keep the rain off. Homes are the literal structure of society. Their most important characteristics are in relationship to other elements.
