i might dispute the branding of these ideas as YIMBY or “abundance”, but there’s a lot of policy wisdom in this by @resnikoff.bsky.social. 1/
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
i might dispute the branding of these ideas as YIMBY or “abundance”, but there’s a lot of policy wisdom in this by @resnikoff.bsky.social. 1/
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
it’s never “deregulation”. there was regulation before the reform. there will be regulation after. it’s character, not “quantity”, of regulation that determines its virtue or vice. 2/
raising money is not a legitimate function of political leaders.
“Moreover, the Biden administration had sent very clear signals that it wouldn’t tolerate a coup. Given the Brazilian military’s heavy dependence on the United States for training + advanced weapon systems, the specter of an aid cutoff from Washington was a powerful deterrent.” youtu.be/Jne9t8sHpUc
Alanis Morissette - Ironic (Official 4K Music Video)
Link Preview: Alanis Morissette - Ironic (Official 4K Music Video): YouTube video by Alanis MorissetteLoading quoted Bluesky post...
i think Dan Wang has a similar view. (it seems intuitively right to me, both are cultures that valorize hustle, both are technophilic, for better and worse both have a kind of manifest-destiny conceit.)
plenty, but not so significant as a share of population. the vast majority of us are going to try to meet our society’s norms and projected aspirations, and will feel we are living lived less than normal if we fail.
“lower” is not the right framing, because consumption isn’t scalar. “growth”, or “degrowth” are not coherent concepts, except in reference to measures that don’t capture what people imagine they do. 1/
The main good that determines whether you think the economy is good or bad is slack. How much headroom is there between what you are going to buy and what you can afford to spend. 1/
You can lose slack because your real purchasing power declines, or because your needs expand. “Needs” are largely a function of structural facts and social norms. 2/
If you model spending only as discretionary choice, treat anything beyond the most basic food and shelter as expendable, as gravy, something optional or superfluous, you will never make sense of what human beings actually experience, and the ructions of behavior that results. /fin
a bold reimagining of the yankee doodle dandy.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
“If there is an inalienable right to life, it should follow that I have an obligation to take reasonable steps to minimize disease that could harm or kill my peers.” // this is general, a thing any serious liberalism must grapple with. the dual of any meaningful right is a burdensome obligation.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
contemporary capitalism is the stench of desperation perfumed with chirpy pitches.
“It’s a lot easier to blame things on NIMBYism than to accept that the whole structure of planning permission might be broken.” @dsquareddigest.bsky.social ht @tomashirstecon.bsky.social
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
“National identities such as ‘French’ and ‘Italian’ were things that had to be invented, and they were often imposed through military or state power.” @resnikoff.bsky.social publiccomment.blog/p/the-great-...
social media is paradoxically both exhausting and insomnia-inducing at the same time.
we live in the age of the Bond villain.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
I just made some shit up. Its authenticity has been confirmed.