perhaps i owe Vanilla an apology!
i could be remembering it wrong?! maybe milli vanilli, but then what was the scandal that laid Vanilla Ice low? i could look this up, i suppose. but where’s the fun in that?
“don’t worry about NIH or NSF. our machines will do the science now and it will be amazing.” they really believe this shit, some of them. you have to admonish yourself (i have to admonish myself) you can’t wish cancer on anyone, that kind of thing is bad for the soul.
Vanilla Ice was a strangely prescient name and lip-syncing seems now such a quaint kind of scandal.
from “Children of the Days”, by Eduardo Galeano. bookshop.org/ebooks/quote...
even when a course correction is urgently required, it may not make sense to blow up the plane.
i don’t follow NYC politics all that closely, but i like that sometimes when i’m quickly skimming Mamdani parses as “Madman”.
"both men start from the presumption that the U.S. government is an entirely corrupt enterprise, with the president in a position to hand out personal favors or engage in personal acts of vengeance." @pkrugman.bsky.social paulkrugman.substack.com/p/wake-up-an...
Wake Up and Smell the Corruption
Link Preview: Wake Up and Smell the Corruption: How far we've fallen, how fast“the only country that has both the resources and the capacity to make credible commitments regarding academic freedom is Norway.” @rajivsethi.bsky.social rajivsethi.substack.com/p/body-blows...
maybe someone should found a university that — i know this is novel — would be governed by its faculty.
at the margin, of course particular institutions matter. there is a project on the verge of getting built that will with more favorable institutions but won’t without. but the question is quantitative. 1/
one position is basically lots of housing would get built if only, say, zoning laws were more friendly. another position is there aren’t so many projects so close to the margin, given the inherent difficulty of getting infill done in affluent, already desirable neighborhoods, against opposition. 2/
I guess the fundamental dispute is between those who think the change has to do with particular institutions of local democracy vs preferences and enfranchisement of people that will find expression under nearly any stable economic order. @dsquareddigest.bsky.social and i think it more the latter.
(note that the old “growth machine” urban politics were not primarily infill of already desirable, prosperous, enfranchised neighborhoods. eventually austins become houstons or dallases as a matter of scale and already-developedness, despite friendly zoning regimes.)
many dense places people behave quite considerately! no 3am 2 live crew when we lived surrounded by apts in SF.
i’m a very live and let live person mostly, but i make an exception for gas powered landscaping equipment, my apt complex is neurotic about staying attractively landscaped and it drives me mad.
a great, short account of why anti-NIMBY-ism is likely always to be an inadequate solution to the scarcity of desirable housing, by @dsquareddigest.bsky.social.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...


