do the “deep research”, “agentic” AI tools know how to avoid AI slop?
if Cecil Rhodes was “responsible for the deaths of as many as 20,000 Africans” his successor has now very easily outdone him. (despite trying so hard, the author of this terrible piece cannot help but confess little good and enduring came of Rhodes’ “energetic”s. but somehow we should hope for Musk)
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
“A key to the pathology of the radical right it offers both a powerful sense of aristocratic elevation and a deep sense of wounded victimization. While in many senses contradictory, this combined sense of being better and being wronged is exceptionally attractive.”
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
cc @poetryforsupper.bsky.social it’s interesting to contrast the hostility to Christianity in these thinkers, as a fountainhead of universalism and therefore democracy, liberalism, socialism, versus the role of evangelicalism today.
credit rating agencies, but for how much we should credit public figures' utterances.
when the world’s biggest nuclear power has its nuclear weapons infrastructure bombed, it’d please me if leading world governments had diplomats trained in diplomacy rather than trolling.
they may come off as innocuous, but poets have very deep connections to organized rhyme.
“Constitutionally, Congress is a superior branch of government to the presidency, and it is explicitly designed to check the president.” @davidfrenchjag.bsky.social www.nytimes.com/2025/06/01/o... // yes.
Opinion | Why Trump Is Mad at the ‘Sleazebag’ Leonard Leo
Link Preview: Opinion | Why Trump Is Mad at the ‘Sleazebag’ Leonard Leothey’re talking about you, @poetryforsupper.bsky.social
Text: With respect to capital, our starting point is the tension between the conception of it as a mass of concrete means of production, on the one hand, and of a quantity of money, on the other. While economic theory treats capital as a quasi-physical substance that grows through the accumulation of savings, in reality, we argue, long run changes in measured capital are almost entirely due to changes in the value of existing assets. These in turn are explained by liquidity and financial conditions, on the one hand, and shifts in the relative social power of asset owners as against workers and the broader society, on the other.
I guess I’d think it almost great, if it were a norm applied consistently. Let’s credit Chuck Schumer’s frump! I have to say “almost” only because with the credit comes a sense of advertisement, of sponsorship, and i increasingly worry about the corrosive effect of that across many domains.
i don’t mean to be insulting anyone. i find it jarring. to me it is an interview with a political figure i admire very much. i’m not opening a magazine. i am clicking a link to a major news publication. perhaps it is old-fashioned of me, second-wave somehow, to worry it is trivializing.
(Vogue is a fashion magazine, though, a bit more understandable there. And Mayor Pete is openly gay, I wonder how often one would find such credits attached to a straight male politician. And why would a publication be providing an interviewee’s clothes?!? That’s perhaps even more bizarre to me.)
