Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

if you find a rip in your jeans, just put a tariff on it and it will be fine.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Committed R voters yes. They know they benefit from all the flaws in the system, and will try to keep it. But everyone else — including independents who strongly lean R when they have to choose between D and R — hates this system. And committed R voters aren’t numerous enough to preserve it.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the electorate in the US fucking hates the two-party system, but understands that voting for 3rd parties is idiocy under the present system, mostly doesn’t understand that all it wld take is an act of Congress to change that, make a multiparty system where 3rd-party votes are not wasted or spoilers.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

with a little bit of public education (about what’s possible, the public already wants the thing, doesn’t know how easily they could have it), electoral reform would have landslide popularity.

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

That’s why its up to democrats to blow the electoral system up. They could make themselves very popular, capture even deep-R leaning independents, if they promise electoral + other reforms that would enable free entry of new parties, fair competition in single-winner elections, PR for legislatures.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i don’t really sleep anymore, but it’s okay now that our diffusion models can do our dreaming for us.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

so corrupt. he has a tremendous personal interest in the domestic vanity industry. arguably he is the largest domestic producer.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

racism is really boring.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“is not!”

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

tbf perhaps i’m credulous or overly generous, but i’ll choose to believe without evidence that he learned something, that for some decades now he’d have understood that direction was a mistake.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i'd be glad to get together with people to talk about it.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

sure!

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it’s distinct from ranked-choice voting, although variations of ranked-choice voting, like single-transferable vote, can implement a form of it. basic ranked-choice voting is for single-winner elections. 1/

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

though there are lots of variations, in proportional representation you are trying to elect something like a legislature or parliament, and the idea is you make sure the number of seats that go to each political party is consistent with the proportion of people who voted for that party. 2/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

our system is not at all like this. suppose a state had 51% Republicans / 49% Democrats. if the two groups were evenly dispersed across all districts, Republicans would win every seat despite having only half the vote. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i guess its very common in conversations about electoral systems and comparative politics. most of the parliaments of Europe use some form of proportional representation, for example.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it's not a thing they're making up, it's a term in common usage. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proport...

Link Preview: 
Proportional representation - Wikipedia

Proportional representation - Wikipedia

Link Preview: Proportional representation - Wikipedia
in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

[new draft post] A pocketbook history of postwar US macro regimes https://drafts.interfluidity.com/2025/09/25/a-pocketbook-history-of-postwar-us-macro-regimes/index.html

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the new york times will ask, how ever did they come to believe such things?

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

There are not, meaningfully. There are two. Yes there are minor parties, but structurally the American system elevates two parties and punishes anyone who deviates from supporting the closest of those two to their values. And that is a catastrophe for democracy. bsky.app/profile/inte...

in reply to this
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

do you feel like you are thriving? do you know or encounter people who are thriving?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

he solved autism! what more do you want?!?

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i guess i don’t think we’d want to include the agents’ welfare in our social welfare function. of course, a social welfare function is an expression of values, so YMMV!

in reply to this