the two party system has become the fascists and everyone-else-not-fascist. it’s not surprising that the former has something of an advantage in coherence.
bring the abhorrent-view-holders by! people’ll be mean to ‘em, but it’s not like the other place is known for niceness!
doing anything that matters makes critics wail louder than supporters praise. in a multiparty system, where you face multiple competitive candidates, other people getting heat doesn’t guarantee any benefit to you. but in a two party system, it does. denouncing while doing nothing becomes the play.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
there are versions of being mean that comprise harassment or hate speech, and we as a “community” or, less grandly, platform should have no tolerance of that. 1/
but most being mean is just meanness. on an open social media platform there will be a lot of it, tolerating it is less censorious than the alternative. 2/
if you are going to speak about controversial things, my advice is do your best just let it wash off your back (blocking or muting, or not, as you please). 3/
don’t mistake what annoys you for some fatal flaw in the platform. people aren’t nicer anywhere else. yes, you may find more compatriots with particular views or interests in other places. stop complaining and bring those people here if you don’t like there. /fin
actually millennia of foundational immigration law was written in fortran.
what do the national guardspeople and marines, most of whom don't have Stephen Miller's view of the world, think of the role into which they've been thrust?
approval voting is much more tractable. fewer moving parts, voters can more accurately understand the implications of their choices.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
i mean, surely Joe Biden’s presiding over the onset of COVID, the initial lockdowns, and most of the inflationary stimulus checks is bad enough. (poe’s law. i know.)
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
i think most people who express anger and disappointment towards Barack Obama aren’t in particular trying to win influence within the Democratic coalition, but are simply expressing their own profound anger and disappointment towards Barack Obama and the choices he made.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
i don’t doubt these tools will help knowledgable people. but they won’t automatically supplant human experts and institutions, rise like benevolent gods to solve all our problems for us even as we destroy competences within ourselves we’ve spent centuries developing.
i could be remembering it wrong?! maybe milli vanilli, but then what was the scandal that laid Vanilla Ice low? i could look this up, i suppose. but where’s the fun in that?
“don’t worry about NIH or NSF. our machines will do the science now and it will be amazing.” they really believe this shit, some of them. you have to admonish yourself (i have to admonish myself) you can’t wish cancer on anyone, that kind of thing is bad for the soul.
Vanilla Ice was a strangely prescient name and lip-syncing seems now such a quaint kind of scandal.
from “Children of the Days”, by Eduardo Galeano. bookshop.org/ebooks/quote...
even when a course correction is urgently required, it may not make sense to blow up the plane.
