Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

there’s a bit i heard on julia galef’s podcast — i quote it at the end of this post www.interfluidity.com/v2/9258.html — analogizing trying to survive under contemporary social media as like trying to drive while on acid. you might make it for a while! but eventually you’ll crash. 1/

interfluidity » Consensus not censorship

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

hopefully we find a way to come down, to a different place, hopefully better than where we started, but still someplace consistent with reasoning and accurate perception. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

(more easily communicated than validated, perhaps.)

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

@williamcb.bsky.social argues that gen-ai singularity talk is a distraction from the singularity ongoing, which we may not notice as it is the water we swim in, the only life we’ve ever known.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Do you think democracy is a good idea? Why or why not? 1/

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

I ask because pretty everyone I interact with seems to self-identify as on the side of democracy, but a lot of people express cynicism about the electorate and the public’s capacity to participate in reasoned deliberation. the most straightforward implication would be democracy is a bad idea. 2/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Do you support democracy anyway on purely negative grounds? (i.e. “it’s the worst system except for all the others that have been tried from time to time”) 3/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

How do you reconcile the deficiencies of contemporary publics, as you perceive them, with a claim to being a stalwart for democracy? /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

if you are troubled by vice they've invented a device.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

insiders generally tell us it’s more “veep” than “house of cards”. l’affaire lizza/nuzzi reminds us that the two aren’t mutually exclusive.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Marjorie Taylor Greene is castigating the “two party toxic political system”. Is she going to join, in some fashion, team electoral reform?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

nuzzigate / lizzagate / pizzagate?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

The best thing you’ll read about the great $140,000 poverty debate, and the fallaciousness of reasoning endemic to the kind of people who get off on calling out other people’s fallacies. by @dsquareddigest.bsky.social ht @nothingsmonstrd.bsky.social @hilzoy.bsky.social

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i’m so jealous of how you’re free of envy.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

that the fate of the world turned, essentially, on an office kiss, and turned very badly, is a fact of the world that’s very hard to sit with.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Do you think there needs to be any kind of consideration of an argument that the Obama Administration was simultaneously the apotheosis of the vision you suggest and an object of great dissatisfaction? Is that all racism we should simply crush and suppress, or were we maybe missing something?

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

we may finally wise up!

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

China is the center. Everywhere else is the periphery.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

only democracy can make the world safe for technocracy.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

you have to admit, that constitutes a certain kind of virtuosity.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

these things will become tractable when we have AGI.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

expiation. lustration. ablution.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

pretty dumb of the United States to abandon its (however notional) commitment to universalism in favor of chauvinism at precisely the moment when a chauvinistic world order would render it an also-ran.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

almost 150 years ago we invented the phone. the latest innovation has been to uninvent it, by inventing the phone tree, customer service center, etc. i now drive miles to talk to people whom, thirty years ago, i’d have conveniently phoned. it’s increasingly the only way to talk to a capable human.