Excellent by @chrisdillow.bsky.social. Explains "dark Keynesianism" — why you have to tax the middle class, the money of the rich (alone) is no good, to make space for public services. Also goes beyond fiscal policy to think in real terms and targeted policy. There are immigration implications. 1/
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
In this context, skilled immigration is a free lunch. You don't have to tax away the viability of current jobs if you don't need to shift current workers into the increased services you want to fund. 2/
If you are willing to let the nurses you want to hire immigrate, you *can* mostly let new money hire them (and just tax the rich if you're worried about fiscal balance in an accounting sense). 3/
The middle class has been persuaded that they pay taxes *to* immigrants when, in a full employment economy, it's immigration that can save them from having to pay taxes, or having to endure the disruption of sectors they work in shrinking in order to force them to retrain as nurses. /fin
so, if Trump gets a third term, Mamdani can be President. that's how this works, right?
i mean in sane places they just never get so polarized you have to call it fuck-you urbanism. Europe builds out in new dense districts all the time. www.esri.com/about/newsro...
i'd like to see a rise of "fuck you urbanism". we're gonna build out whole new mixed-used, pedestrian-awesome, high-density districts bc you assholes of locked us out of your desirable neighborhoods. we're gonna make your neighborhoods last year's thing. what's that gonna do to your home values?
i think this was intended. Donald Trump is not unshrewd. the Mamdani Miracle replaces all the lame-duck chatter. it's a good plot twist.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
writers, what were you thinking, today could have been Monday, Marjorie Mamdani Monday!
it’s not so much that digital media divide us as they dissolve us. the space of what you can interact with is constituted ever more sparsely of humans.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
incentives matter, but disproportionately to the worst people.
what is we employed people to help you put together these plans, and help put these plans in action? they could even keep thick rolodexes, and connect you to potential opportunities. we might call it “active labor market policy”. it has a certain ring!
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
i can attest to a certain immoderation in some of your habits, going back decades!
are social democrats “leftists”? democratic socialists? self-described communists? trans rights advocates? feminists? civil rights advocates? what does the word even mean? who are people talking about when they say “leftists”?
“think tanks” should be entirely obsoleted by organizations called “political parties”.
there are a lot of people i’d could work in concert with who i wouldn’t want to share a sleeping bag — or a tent, or even a big tent — with. we need more tents.
Plus, pure volatility — people who on average are not so wealthy enjoying occasional windfall years that put them in a top quantile, but whose other years are austere — does not constitute meaningful mobility, is welfare destructive compared to just receiving the average income at a steadier rate.
