No! Businesses can sponsor people they want to hire for a green card. It’s a thing! A bigger thing than H-1B visas in fact! www.uscis.gov/sites/defaul...
again, if the issue is H-1Bs are preferred because smaller employers find them bureaucratically easier, that’s an argument for reforming the process for obtaining EB visas. 1/
I think these are dimensions it’s fruitful for employers to lobby to streamline, rather than fallback to H-1B. Prevailing wage determination, in any case more bureaucratic hassle than effective control, is less important when the recruit will have a green card and can quit for better work. 1/
The Biden Administration was about to effectively end it for lots of roles H-1Bs are used for. Which was fine. www.forbes.com/sites/stuart... 2/
One Of Biden’s Best Immigration Reforms Appears Dead
Link Preview: One Of Biden’s Best Immigration Reforms Appears Dead: A Biden administration immigration reform to make it easier for high-skilled talent to gain employment-based green cards appears dead.In any case, however much the process annoys employers, I think the EB visas are generally fully subscribed to their cap. That’s not to defend rationing them by bureaucratic hassle! It’s a bad form of rationing. 3/
But we’d know we’d have a problem if we fold H-1Bs into the EB cap but employers fail to use the extra slots. We should still reform the process (as people constantly suggest of the H-1B program too) so slots are allocated neither randomly nor by makework. /fin
perhaps to the degree policymakers have freedom to act independently of the winds affecting voters. i didn’t suggest the truth of the matter is or should be irrelevant to policy, but that it is to politics. actors who’d be better off if what’s true is false will condemn our wise policymaker.
if it requires careful social science to suss out the truth of the matter, then the truth of the matter is entirely irrelevant to the politics of the matter.
do you actually own your car, or is it licensed to you?
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
(they definitely have the skyscrapers. but have they reproduced — i hope not! — the ghost-town-at-night, commuter only financial districts that skyscrapers in the US mostly inhabit?)
in Quito at one end of the touristy old city, there were police stationed basically to tell clueless tourists like us not to take the cool looking stairs down into what I guess would be some very different, more dangerous area. i still kind of wanted to take the stairs, but we didn't.
I'd like to get a better sense of urbanism in China. They obviously have some amazing trains. How are they doing on lively, walkable, transit-accessible mixed-use neighborhoods? I know there have some car-centric, towers-in-the-park-on-arterials style development. What direction are they going?
gonna be hard to hit fundraising or to make things expensive for this one.
