Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it’s a core official act under conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

When you’re the President, they let you do it. You can do anything.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

pour encourager les autres. Congresspeople who “do the right thing” and pay a political price for it must be seen to be rewarded with lucrative post-politics careers. $5M is nothing compared to the loot she’s delivered. modest compensation for past work.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

you can burn down the court because you think it’s biased. okay. it may very well have been. but if you then mistake reversion to the justice of the lynch mob as corrective reform, well, then you are kind of an idiot. 1/

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

absent institutions to adjudicate it, there is no authoritative truth, just competing contradictory claims. and that is quite the opposite of a recipe for reconciliation. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

what if instead of skeet or toot or tweet, we just called each post a treat?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

but you want beliefs and realities to coincide. it'd be good if we permitted to build in ways that reasonably can be permanent, and let those feelings encourage investment that will actually work out.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

shouldn't Elon Musk have immunity for his Acts too?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

is it accurate that, despite all the impediments to building in general, when a disaster destroys a person's home, a right to rebuild what was lost is grandfathered in? if that is accurate, isn't it a terrible idea?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

📌

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it’s not a sex robot it’s an automate.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

so, we could build say, a new Chongqing at Malibu in such a way it wouldn’t burn down every decade or two?

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

is there any version of urbanity that could be built and would not burn in fire-prone areas of Southern California, or would any form of human habitation burn under the conditions nature presents (and humans exacerbate) there?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“platform corporations are structurally incapable of good governance, primarily because most of their central aims (continuous growth, market dominance, profit via extraction) conflict with many basic human and societal needs.” @kissane.bsky.social www.wrecka.ge/bad-shape/

Link Preview: 
Bad shape: The idea I keep coming back to is that the big platforms, like Dickens' Marley, were dead to begin with, and are now something particularly bad, which is dead on their feet.

Bad shape

Link Preview: Bad shape: The idea I keep coming back to is that the big platforms, like Dickens' Marley, were dead to begin with, and are now something particularly bad, which is dead on their feet.
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

what did he know?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

finding not so much to root for today. i hope the fires are contained, suppressed, extinguished. i guess that’s something.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

📌

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

📌

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

they deny it exists, but climate change serves an essential function for the right. it proves progress only makes things worse and we need to go back to their mythologized past. the disasters are caused by lesbians, they say. they have blessed themselves with abundant disasters.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

🙁

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

one thing about canada, greenland, panama, the gulf of armenia — we’re talking about shit HE says again, rather than shit Elon says. which may be more important than greenland to him.