does this mean we are no longer liberated?
you have it right. in the US it's generally used to refer to the full nonfinancial economy, not just retail.
our special relationship is we like to get high on main street together.
it’s really funny people actually persuaded themselves Musk would be the voice of sanity. i mean, he tweets. he has for a long time.
“it turns out that a statistical aggregate economic gain does not produce an increase in real world human well being if all of that statistical gain is captured by a single, tiny powerful interest group.” @hamiltonnolan.bsky.social www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/an-interna...
“He has to blame immigrants and the disabled, because to blame anything or anyone else would be to question capitalism. Which cannot be done.” @chrisdillow.bsky.social stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_an...
maybe you need to have a Hoover before you can get an FDR. (honestly i’d rather just have a US Congress that represents the broad public and is not supine.)
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
the hubristic "best and brightest" are responsible for many, many, failures and catastrophes. it does not follow, however, we are learning, that we should therefore vest power in the worst and the stupidest.
not sure the Fed's balance sheet keeps shrinking. ( source fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WALCL )
this is what retribution looks like. against existence itself. against anything or anyone that might have or might yet annoy him.
RoW ex-China is likely to be unproblematically aligned on low trade barriers. Yes, before all this, there was a significantly likelihood that eg Europe would put up barriers to China, perhaps in concert with a saner US. They still might. 1/
But China, especially ex-US demand, is a massive potential source of disinflation. So if RoW-ex-China wants to avoid recession, it can modulate barriers with China to that end. 2/
For example, the EU might put up sizable barriers to, say, auto imports, where they have an incumbent industry they wish to preserve, and perhaps overcapacity due to limited US demand. 3/
But most of what China produces Europe does not have an immediate need to protect. Like Biden's US, over a medium term, EU may be interested in more diversified sourcing for a variety of important industries. But that won't require precipitous imposition of barriers into the teeth of a crisis. 4/
So what I'd advise e.g. European countries would be very narrow, perhaps steep, barriers to China in strategic industries, but otherwise openness through the adjustment period. The EU can afford an overall trade deficit at little meaningful cost, as long as its key industries are protected. 5/
After the storm, they can go back to what we and they were working on before, more diversified and resilient supply, and more tools to nudge toward overall balance, without breaking the global trade system. 6/
(i’d respond but you’ve said pretty much exactly what i’d say!)
If Trump remains obstinately on this course, a US recession (at the very least) is certain. Whether the recession is global depends whether rest-of-world big economies can get over either their austerity fetish or their unwillingness to seriously tax the very rich. 1/
(Traditionally, it's deficit spending that's considered stimulus. But taxing the very wealthy affects overall demand almost not at all, while government spending still stimulates demand. Investment spending is a function of anticipated consumer demand much more than rich-person wealth.) /fin
so far "it would be genuinely idiotic" has not been much of a constraint!
on Mar 31, I placed an order for a customized Mac laptop, trying to beat the tariffs. it was scheduled for delivery Apr 14. a payments glitch meant the order wasn't actually placed until Apr 1. the laptop was delivered to the local Apple Store Apr 4. I think they too were trying to beat the tariffs.
John Roberts' "entire project has been that of imposing strict limits on the remedial power of the courts… this has the effect of permitting the 'bad men' of American public life to make the law their perch and not their terror." @hurricanexyz.bsky.social eveningconstitutional.net/john-roberts...



