Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

that you support a thing doesn’t mean you support every implication of the thing. i support highway speeds faster than 40 mph, which may well imply more traffic fatalities. but that doesn’t mean i am for traffic fatalities.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“They seem to have confused masculinity with childishness — petulance, aggression and self-obsession being their idea of maleness.” @edwardluce.bsky.social

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

An amazingly rich and thorough long read on rent control as an institution and the importance of security of tenure to the formation of public goods like vibrant and secure neighborhoods, by @filipamv.bsky.social. One of the best things I’ve ever read on rent control and the issues surrounding it.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

patronage, partisanship, and misgovernment. a talented person who devotes his talents to resentment, ego, and the purchase of political support. a tale too small to be tragic, too destructive to be comedic. ht @dianabhenriques.bsky.social

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i guess one way to concisely state the theory of Trumpism is that money is meritocracy.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i for one think we should bring the second best available evidence to the problem.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

or, will the Supreme Court, reveling in extratextuality and with an irony they’d find delicious, claim that the 14th Amendment nationalized the Presidential pardon?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

look, if your wife is mad at you it’s fine, Donald Trump can just issue a pardon.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

"the public sector ought to have, and in practice generally does have, a much lower discount rate than the private sector. This used to be a big part of debates on the economics of climate change. But it’s also relevant to housing." (see also CA Prop 13) an excellent post by @jwmason.bsky.social

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

(the party is unusually fortunate at the moment.)

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Interesting piece by @wertwhile.bsky.social argues treating certain kinds of algorithmic curation as first-party speech, removing them Section 230 liability protection, suggests tort liability as the least harmful way to regulate AI. www.theargumentmag.com/p/treat-big-... ht @ezraklein.bsky.social

Link Preview: 
Treat Big Tech like Big Tobacco: The problem with TikTok and Facebook isn't their size

Treat Big Tech like Big Tobacco

Link Preview: Treat Big Tech like Big Tobacco: The problem with TikTok and Facebook isn't their size
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

( i'm sympathetic to both of these ideas, see www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv... www.interfluidity.com/v2/8093.html on Section 230, drafts.interfluidity.com/2023/12/28/h... on AI regulation. )

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“You can’t libel entire ethnicities and then cry about decaying standards. You are the lower standard, you cheap thug.”

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

bill 🤝 bernie brave new world.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

instead, one way to understand the antivax movement is as a red herring to distract from the financial inconveniences of environmental causes.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

what if our republic were a multilevel marketing company? 🤔

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

For a cause to be just, there has to be a telos, a desired end-state, that offers a decent outcome to everyone, even those perceived to be on the other side of the cause. 1/

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

"Decent" doesn't mean an outcome everyone desires or would at present consent to. If that were the case, there would be no conflict. 2/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

But a just cause offers outcomes it can credibly argue all parties *should* consent to, all parties would be fairly served if they did consent to, even though for now they do not all consent. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

we so often see the first person where there is no person.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“History is clear: countries escape debt traps through growth” @arjunjayadev.bsky.social @jwmason.bsky.social & Ahilan Kardirgamar jwmason.substack.com/p/sri-lankas...

Link Preview: 
Sri Lanka's Interest Rate Trap: by Arjun Jayadev, Ahilan Kardirgamar and J. W. Mason

Sri Lanka's Interest Rate Trap

Link Preview: Sri Lanka's Interest Rate Trap: by Arjun Jayadev, Ahilan Kardirgamar and J. W. Mason
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

"Two button meme", with one button labeled "Price Vector" the other "Market free from state interference", captioned "Hayekians in an age of surveillance pricing"
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

what distinguishes Elon Musk from his peers is an incapacity to keep his work — on projects they often share — discreet.