Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

however begrudgingly, one has to hand the administration some credit for finally securing the northern border. no one crosses it into the United States anymore.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i don't know that any service has enjoyed an enshittification arc quite as steep as meetup.com, which briefly seemed like a revolutionary and essential utility and now seems like a scammy, spammy backwater. 1/

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i'm sorry for it too, because in its heyday i think it genuinely did lubricate and encourage in-person civil society. nothing as convenient and effective has emerged to supersede it. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

📌

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it’s the authentic will of the people when they seem to agree with me. it’s the way the system is rigged when it appears that they do not. (hint: there’s no such thing as the authentic will of the people independent of the system by which it is ascertained or constituted.)

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“We allowed markets to produce a class of politically connected billionaires… Now that enough billionaires have lined up behind fascism and authoritarian consolidation, it’s clear…liberal governments…will need to figure out ways to greatly reduce the wealth and social power of that class overall.”

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

📌

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

someone is not even wrong on the internet.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i’d explore them to find out but i’m chicken.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

I haven’t really written on it, but, perhaps predictably, I think a lot of it comes down to what “richer” means as economists measure it (dollars spent deflated by some inflation series) and how a skewed income distribution distorts that. 1/

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“We” spend more on the goods of the affluent while our capacity to produce what used to be ordinary withers because the nonaffluent have seen their wealth grow more slowly than costs grow due both to Baumol’s disease and producer market power. /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it’s weird how economists say we’re richer than we’ve ever been, and yet there’s so much we used to afford that somehow we no longer can. (and no, “Baumol” is not a sufficient explanation.)

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the natural lifecycle of an asset class is 1. succeed unconventionally 2. fail conventionally 3. bailout 4. enjoy state backing and stabilization indefinitely

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

remember when a New York Times editor got fired for running a Tom Cotton opinion piece arguing in favor of what the President is now doing routinely?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

whatever Donald Trump imagines to be true is the sole source of truth. so Donald Trump can always correctly evaluate the truth of things by noting whether they jibe with or diverge from his infallible preconceptions.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

TNSTAAFL. We always face tradeoffs.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it’s a sketchy gas station you can walk to, without dodging traffic along shithole arterials. that is at least something of a difference!

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the narrow path would be via maintenance and enhancement of soft power through the process of rebalancing. but that seems far from the path the US has chosen.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

there’s a lot of ruin in a nation, but eventually it’s going to matter just how much.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“if we are moving away from strictly economic determinants of voter attitudes, it might worth asking about whether the extreme wealth of leading Democrats matters.”

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

everything is relative. a storm surge of 10-15 feet would have us flooded. we’re “zone c” pinellas.gov/storm-surge/ not the worst, but more at risk than the vast majority of the state.

Link Preview: 
Storm Surge - Pinellas County: Storm surge is the water that is pushed onto land as a hurricane makes landfall. Know if you are at risk by looking up your evacuation zone.

Storm Surge - Pinellas County

Link Preview: Storm Surge - Pinellas County: Storm surge is the water that is pushed onto land as a hurricane makes landfall. Know if you are at risk by looking up your evacuation zone.
in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

they intersect. in the 3 years we’ve lived here, we’ve evacuated twice. which was inconvenient but we made little unexpected trips out of them, a tolerable quirk for us of living at a low elevation. but we’ve depended on the extraordinary competence of NOAA/NWS/NHC, which may become impaired.

in reply to this