they’re just going to will him despite all evidence into the pretext they’ve been itching for.
i do have websites that exist and i give google approximately zero thought as i publish them.
pretty convenient how quickly The Left has forgotten sandwich guy.
“The politics of insurance, Rebecca Elliot has argued, is ultimately about ‘what is fair and valuable, what needs protecting and what should be let go, who deserves assistance and on what terms, and whose expectations of future losses are used to govern the present.’”
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
it is troubling, on a day like this, to have not so much faith in the competence, honesty, or intentions of the current FBI.
This is a good @mattyglesias.bsky.social piece. www.slowboring.com/p/national-c...
“National” conservatism is un-American
Link Preview: “National” conservatism is un-American: Liberals should respect our heritage; conservatives should see that our heritage is liberal“you will hate us, but you will pay us anyway.” the new capitalism.
the automobile can be a great servant, but has proven itself (especially in the United States) a terrible master.
the consequence of tolerating misgovernance is you are misgoverned. which can be a pretty big motherfucking consequence!
our brave new financial system.
Trump is a charismatic, narcissistic, toddler in the wrong place at the wrong time. John Roberts is intentional and responsible. He did this and is doing it.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
We don't always love one anothers' windups, do we? We can get on anyway. Thanks for the information. I don't know that I stand corrected, but I'm glad the Center for Public Enterprise was there. 1/
I've a lot of respect for Wiener, but most of us (including Teles) wouldn't place him "red plenty". Everyone through "liberal abundance" is extremely pro transit. (Whether "Moderate-Abundance synthesis" is I leave to you, since it is a category invented very precisely to describe you!) /fin
This is old, but it remains my preferred approach to (housing) abundance in the US. You’d probably slot it in the “red plenty” tradition. www.interfluidity.com/v2/8772.html (@holz-bau.bsky.social makes an appearance, from the first time I ever encountered him, and he’s only gotten better.)
could be! let us know who you’re thinking, how broad the tent is. it’s pretty clear this abundance conference embraced a remarkably big tent to the right. let us know how it did, or the movement will, invite participation by people who think successful abundance must be largely a public project.
Mamdani would have been an obvious figure. (I have no idea whether he was invited or not.)
“(As far as I can tell, no one from what Teles calls the ‘Red Plenty’ wing was invited to speak.)” @resnikoff.bsky.social publiccomment.blog/p/when-is-a-... // do they eschew purity tests, or just have a different notion of what counts as pure?
when the dust settles, will we think of it more as suicide or murder?


