even if they are soulless mechanical optimizers, depending what and how they optimize, they may seem to “care” or not, though.
yes, though we have to constitute a social democratic state, we have real agency, not just a simulation thereof, we can, almost certainly do fuck up, provide the goods we mean to provide suboptimally or worse. and a state has limited capacity to deceive and manipulate, compared to hypothetical ASI.
how much is hollywood to blame for our elevation of antiheroes to positions of potentially catastrophic authority?
he does consider questions of emergent better people in the sense of institutional development rendering us more capable of managing, but seems skeptical our institutions could match the pace of the ASIs.
[new draft post] Alignment is confinement https://drafts.interfluidity.com/2025/05/08/alignment-is-confinement/index.html
( riffing off of @michaelnielsen.bsky.social )
"Even if we preserve our jobs, we are sacrificing our profession." www.nytimes.com/2025/05/08/o... ht @trillymopena.bsky.social @jacobtlevy.bsky.social
Opinion | West Point Is Supposed to Educate, Not Indoctrinate
Link Preview: Opinion | West Point Is Supposed to Educate, Not Indoctrinatehe'd likely have been barred from holding office, more incontrovertibly than the mere fact of his being an insurrectionist proved to be.
it seemed like a good idea at the time somehow. if you do a full reload, i've gentled them up a bit. maybe it's a bit better. RSS and subscribe-by-mail avoids the perhaps dumb type-and-hand-written drafts conceit entirely. sorry!
at the time the stakes of Trump's second impeachment did not seem so high. of course he should have been convicted and removed, obviously. but Repubicans' cowardice felt like passing the buck on a symbolic act, rather than putting the republic at risk.
China seems very capable of replacing Western products, even the ones where we still claim to define the technological frontier. It would be good if we were similarly capable. Tariffs won't get us there, at least not on their own.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Yesterday, I wanted to confirm that "Gambling Device" by Frank Herbert, was the short story I remembered about a hotel that forbade gambling. So I asked Claude and ChatGPT for summaries. They so confidently made stuff up, I assumed I misremembered. 1/
Thankfully, archive.org lent me a collection containing the short story, which I quickly reread. It was, of course, the story I recalled, not the stories Claude or ChatGPT had hallucinated. /fin
Text: There’s been an enormous amount of discussion about what holds back markets in physical commodities like housing and energy, but also what prevents innovation and invention. One argument is that there are too many government-generated rules and regulations that slow everything down. Another is that the absence of government structuring leads to private regulations, imposed by dominant firms on their own terms to often exclude rivals and extract money. When those private regulations are forced into remission, markets can explode with new products and offers. That’s happening right now in real time in the market for mobile phone apps, and particularly the distribution of those apps to customers. It represents the first real, thorough, and permanent consequences to a Big Tech company for monopolizing markets. And literally within 24 hours of a federal court’s Wednesday ruling imposing sanctions for this misconduct, competitors have been rushing into the space in ways that will make the market fairer, more affordable, and more abundant.
to be fair, that often happens even to those who confront college as a sacred opportunity to engage and develop a vigorous and lively mind. arguably the come-down is that much harder.
if we were not idiots, gen AI would be driving us to turn colleges into Socratic spaces. everything would be in-person, synchronous, analog. writing would be blue book. we’d discuss (rather than rate) one another’s work. any “homework” would be productive projects, for which use of any tool is fine.
