Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

kind of the flip side of “every accusation is a confession”, often virtues they attribute to themselves are unpersuasive appropriations of the work of others.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“Both the attention theory and moderation theory share the same fundamental flaw: they accept the existing conflict terrain as given and static. The moderation data nerds and shutdown commentators are bringing the same one-dimensional view.” @leedrutman.bsky.social

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

“The vision of politics—technocratic experts pulling just the right levers to secure just enough votes—is not just sterile + unappealing. It…has…consequences…contributing to the…sense…strategists + politicians don’t really care abt what they are saying… The poll-tested candidate looks like a phony…”

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

radical centrists are utopian in the sense that they’re always nowhere at all.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

hospitals. famously cyclical.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

a minimal prerequisite of sovereignty. it’s shocking how many states just bleed data and fees to US companies.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

kind of wanna get my account suspended now.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

right. and some of those people do list at the prices they’d like but won’t very quickly receive, generating inventory. i think that my intuition is closer to yours than the original poster, that this is more a demand than a supply story. but it’s fun because you can tell both!

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the intention of the post you quote is to use inventory to explain price. inventory is a function of a rate of supply in addition to price. at any given price, there’s a rate of sale, and inventory will grow at production or new offer rate minus that rate of sale. 1/

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

so it’s a dirty measure of something that can, potentially, non-tautologically, explain price, but that dirtiness makes it delightfully difficult to interpret! /fin

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

does inventory cause price or does price cause inventory? (usually causal arrows go both ways, but is the inventory-causes-price story true enough it can reliably guide policy?)

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i just try to write it!

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

"Being an Apple customer is like being in a 24/7 BDSM relationship…without a safe-word. Maybe you like the control Apple exerts over your life most of the time, but if they ever start to hurt you, there's no way to make them stop" ~Cory Doctorow pluralistic.net/2025/09/28/w...

Pluralistic: Plenty of room at the bottom (of the tech stack) (29 Sep 2025) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

image/meme-based communication may be something quite different, i don't know. short-form video is also something distinct, but does seem closer to classical orality and gossip, although the differences may matter too.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

we can just lord it over them into our nineties then.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

maybe!

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

maybe we as a society decide we don’t want increased orality. maybe we put our thumb on the scale in a variety of ways for an internet of text.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

nevah!

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the process of persuasion between now and then would likely be ungentle.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

have you brought any gold statuettes to my office?

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

only on toast!

in reply to this