Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

you get fun pictures!

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

celebrated the fourth this year with a colonoscopy. felt about right. doesn’t look like i have colon cancer. maybe there’s hope for my country as well.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

it’s hard to be an institutionalist when these are the institutions.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

so, tomorrow is the 4th of July.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i hate feeling this way. but my god, what those motherfuckers have done today. and the “supreme court”.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

ask Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Boris Berezovsky, etc.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

no guard rails. www.bloomberg.com/news/article...

Link Preview: 
Supreme Court Clears Trump to Send Migrants to South Sudan: The US Supreme Court said the Trump administration is free to send eight migrants to South Sudan, rejecting a judge’s interpretation of a recent high court decision.

Supreme Court Clears Trump to Send Migrants to South Sudan

Link Preview: Supreme Court Clears Trump to Send Migrants to South Sudan: The US Supreme Court said the Trump administration is free to send eight migrants to South Sudan, rejecting a judge’s interpretation of a recent high court decision.
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

because you can always rely on absolute power to keep what you take to be its word… sigh.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

a thing i find weird is, was there even any meaningful debate on the whole new Gestapo thing? i know legislators talked about Medicaid, rural hospitals, deficits and baselines. but it seems like the new Gestapo was unproblematic, a shoo in, not any not even one of Republican legislators’ concerns.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

#relatable

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the Republicans will, in this indirect, kind of confusing way, provoke a crisis in Medicare and then argue the program is inherently broken and only some further austerity can “strengthen” it by “putting it on a solid foundation”. govern badly as proof that the state can do nothing good well.

Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Resilience is a dimension of epistemology we (at least I) have too little considered. However we know what we know, how resilient is it to interests that seek to snow us, or leave us without what had once been our capacity to know?

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

🙁

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i regret to inform you you are no longer you.

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

i think i’m suggesting a somewhat stronger claim. for this Supreme Court, many of its decisions individually can be attributed to benign or at least defensible reasoning that fails to adequately address “unintended” consequences. so in that sense, ignorance and malice are hard to distinguish. 1/

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

but i’m claiming though Hanlon’s Razor suggests we stick with ignorance or incompetence, with this Court the parsimonious explanation must be malice, that the adverse (from most of our perspectives) unintended consequences are in fact intended. 2/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

the Court has a longstanding (Citizen’s United, voting rights) pattern of provoking such consequences through means many contemporaries perceive. 3/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

which form of facially benign or defensible reasoning they apply they vary willy nilly but not randomly. they choose one that predictably will cause what most of us would take to be adverse consequences, while unpersuasively and ultimately mistakenly pretending they’ve addressed the concern. 4/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

individually, each decision might be attributed to good faith mistakes, reasonable disagreements, a kind of legalistic blindness that puts certain procedural principles before outcomes, but in a neutral way. 5/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

in aggregate, however, all of that is untenable. their behavior is not indistinguishable form ignorance. it is driven by malice outright, or a set of ideological views that most of the public would characterize as malicious if plainly and candidly stated drafts.interfluidity.com/2024/11/19/p... /fin

Plutocracy as a positive ideal

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

what’s the inverse of Hanlon’s Razor? i think that’s what applies to the current Supreme Court.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

@ryanlcooper.com on elite impunity: “any country that completely gives up on accountability for its political class will eventually produce someone like Trump. Open the door to criminals, and sooner or later one will walk through.” prospect.org/politics/202...

Link Preview: 
Turns Out Appeasing Trump Only Emboldened Him: Having evaded accountability when he was out of power, he’s running amok today.

Turns Out Appeasing Trump Only Emboldened Him

Link Preview: Turns Out Appeasing Trump Only Emboldened Him: Having evaded accountability when he was out of power, he’s running amok today.
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

plutocrats are the ultimate degrowthers, because serious growth requires unpredictable change, and plutocrats want to fix current hierarchies in amber. you see this now in the Trump Administration’s reinforcement of fossil fuels and suppression of solar / batteries / etc.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

you’ll know evil when you see what people will do in the name of god.

Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

more money is more thugs in masks and incarceration camps that require air conditioning. i’d be grateful of these fund’s were earmarked for quality of conditions rather than quantity, but i don’t think that’s the intent of ~10x-ing ICE’s budget.

in reply to this