the reemployment historically required an increasingly redistributive state, though. before that happens, the result of labor-transformative technologies can indeed be immiseration, as early job losses aren’t matched by sufficient new demand to provoke reemployment.
i like to think about what fraction of e-mails in my inbox are fundamentally lying or trying to deceive me. that is after all the spam filtering, my frequent unsubscribe requests, etc.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
the number of operations a CPU can perform in a second is easy to adjust for, and gets treated as disinflationary as it increases. the shit that ends up sopping up those operations in practice is not so easy to quantify and adjust for.
yup. but it’s difficult-to-straightforwardly-adjust-for dimensions of quality that shrink.
enshittification does not typically show up in inflation statistics. does anyone thing that means the phenomenon is not real, it’s just a collective delusion of negativity?
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
the thesis “contemporary social media contributes dysfunctionally to a collective sense of pessimistic nihilism” is, i think, correct. it is not inconsistent, however, with the thesis “a great deal is terrible about Americans’ material conditions, and worse in a variety of ways than previously.” 1/
what if the Trump administration lifted sanctions just enough that IRGC can trade on US markets, but long positions only?
it’s the index funds values, not the IRA-ness that is at issue. you’ll want to take a look at the Kalecki-Levy profits equation economistwritingeveryday.com/2021/01/19/t... and also graphs like the one in this skeet. bsky.app/profile/varu...
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
the basic intuition is any sector’s surplus is some other sector’s deficit. profit is the corporate sector’s surplus. it must be built from deficits of the household, government, or foreign sector. 1/
the US foreign sector is in surplus vis-a-vis the US. holding that constant, either households & the government must be in deficit enough to cover both the foreign and corporate sector surplus. 2/
you’d need a huge household debt boom (which would be bad) to support those surpluses if the govt deficit were to substantially decline. 3/
i find it funny when people holding big retirement nest eggs in index funds wag about how they want to reduce the deficit.
goldman and musk inc joining forces feels like what if napoleon and hitler got together for an encore tour of europe. kind of an all-stars circuit for death stars of different eras.
it may be the end of the world, but our description of it qualifies as a gripping page-turner. preorder now. (quickly, please.)
he’s like a private sector Marco Rubio! ht @ericmbudd.com
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
Ovid in exile.

