can we admit that billionaires are a policy failure that must be remedied now?
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
can we admit that billionaires are a policy failure that must be remedied now?
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
yes. it's political insiders — concerned about donors and donor-financed opposition campaigns — that tend to be more cautious of increasing taxes in the rich, more cautious than the public, including even the Republican public. taxing the rich more polls very well.
“yes,” said the boy who cried wolf. “but there were guard rails — i mean fences — around the village those times.”
“I’ve noticed a little linguistic tic in some recent public statements – the use of the word ‘ruthless’ as if it was a synonym for ‘diligent’ or ‘competent’.” @dsquareddigest.bsky.social backofmind.substack.com/p/ruthless-p... // kind of dark. reminds me of Kamala Harris’ choice of “lethal”.
no. just support FDR style taxation, and maybe an Elizabeth Warren wealth tax to boot.
without comment www.wsj.com/world/russia...
Elon Musk’s Secret Conversations With Vladimir Putin — The Wall Street Journal
Link Preview: Elon Musk’s Secret Conversations With Vladimir Putin — The Wall Street Journal: Regular contacts between world’s richest man and America’s chief antagonist raise security concerns; topics include geopolitics, business and personal mattersyes. they love to issue paper attached to weak obligations in exchange for purchasing power over real goods and services. but it’s an affront to God if a government does it.
you’ve become a casualty of the war — in a sense, just a bit — if you find your initial reaction to news of soldiers’ deaths on the side that you dislike is unleavened by sadness or grief.
you think this is unintended? the plan is to snort what you’ve become on November 6. they were hoping for some ketamine in the mix.
they have a theory based on an idealized libertarian gold standard, along with profound cynicism and hostility towards the govt, and the idea it might be able to issue paper on advantageous terms, enabling it to act capaciously. i agree there’s a FAFO aspect to it. to bad we’re along for the ride.
i don't actually think they are more "ask not what you can do for your country" than the other way around.
i love this guy. of course he was crushed. from Ben Ryder Howe nymag.com/intelligence... ht @lollardfish.bsky.social @maeamian.bsky.social
Text: The ranger, Alex Sienkiewicz, had infuriated the ranchers by tearing down their “No Trespassing” signs. In the summer of 2016, he sent a staffwide email that read, “This is my regular reminder: NEVER ask permission to access the National Forest Service through a traditional route shown on our maps EVEN if that route crosses private land. NEVER ASK PERMISSION; NEVER SIGN IN.”
[new draft post] Midsize is the right size drafts.interfluidity.com/2024/10/24/m...
when throwing one scapegoat off the cliff doesn’t resolve the problem, well you need to find another scapegoat to throw off the cliff for that!
A very good interview by @lexfridman.bsky.social of #BernieSanders, a guy who through all the twists and turns has retained my admiration. It's also quite remarkable how quick and on-point he remains, compared to his contemporaries, Joe Biden, Donald Trump. lexfridman.com/bernie-sande...
#450 – Bernie Sanders Interview | Lex Fridman Podcast
Link Preview: #450 – Bernie Sanders Interview | Lex Fridman Podcast: Bernie Sanders is a US Senator from Vermont and a two-time presidential candidate. Thank you for listening ❤ Check out our sponsors: https://lexfridman.com/sponsors/ep450-sc See below for timestamps, ...Culturally, we’ve grown accustomed to rooting for anti-heroes. I wonder if that hasn’t primed us to be able to vote for someone like Donald Trump, in full(ish) knowledge of who he is. Are we just collectively Breaking Bad?
Text: Here is one thing we can say for sure about union members who vote for Trump: The fact that they are union members is not the most important part of their own identity. If it were, they could be easily persuaded not to vote for Trump, a literal billionaire scab who we have already seen act like a typical anti-labor Republican during his term in the White House. Hell, J.D. Vance gave a speech opposing the PRO Act just a few days ago! The interesting question here is not whether these guys are full of shit when they ask union members for support; the interesting question is why many union members care so little about being union members that they allow themselves to be tempted into the Republican camp. Their competing identities — as macho guys, or as racists, or as anti-elites, or as Christians, or whatever — have overtaken any hold that their identity as a union member may have had on their hearts and minds. That is a problem that cannot be solved by any politicians. It can only be solved by the labor movement itself.