no, not if it was up to me. it’d be one person, one shot, with maybe a restriction on winning twice in a short time. 1/

remember 90% of people are in the bottom 90%. universal, flat transfers bring us toward equality, and avoid the need and time tax and gaming and stigmatization and accusations of corruption any kind of means testing regime provokes. 2/

if you are concerned about the top having too much and getting more (you should be!) raising high-income tax rates is an elegant way to do that without micromanaging and delegitimating universal programs. 3/

( for where i wrote up the random transfers idea www.interfluidity.com/v2/918.html ) /fin