i’m less interested in his career trajectory than in what he destroys along its path. he’s already destroyed my alma mater (New College of Florida). i’m not sure how much of the destruction of US higher ed can be attributed directly to him. 1/

DiAngelo was a kind of excess and grift and he is that too. but DiAngelo wasn’t an effective agent of destruction and perhaps fascist reconstruction in the way Rufo has been. this take strikes me as a bit too sanguine. /fin