No, I wasn't saying you misunderstood my point, just that your tweet read in a legit amusing way! 1/

A more substantive response would be, stipulating race is less correlated with elite ability than sex, it's a difference of degree rather than kind, while the costs of discrimination arguably remain sharp. 2/

Even if outliers are fewer than they would be with race discrimination, why not make a place for them? At less elite levels, why not let everyone compete with people well matched by criteria less course than sex or gender? /fin