Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

The whole project of social democracy, the whole project of the historical United States, the reason it rose to become a superpower, is to enable coordination at scale that transcends ethnonational bases for statehood. 1/

in reply to this
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

The divisions in the United States reflect elite manipulations, not ancient hatreds. We have only recently become red vs blue. Ohio was not part of the confederacy, but it is now. 2/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

This was an active result of the pathologies of out political system. That it rewarded a "Southern strategy" that was about reconstituting Confederate dysfunction. 3/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

The 2025 electorate is much more ethnonationally riven, much more divided, than the 2005 electorate. That is the work of politics on the public, not the work of the public on politics. 4/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

The whole art is to build and sustain democratic institutions that match the nation to the state, rather than build ethnostates to match a nation. 5/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

It's easy to be pessimistic at the moment, but for the bulk of America's history — and in its reflection, much of Europe's postwar history — has been success. 6/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

We have plenty of reason to think a thriving multiconfessional polity is possible, as long as exaggerated material class divisions are not permitted to emerge. 7/

in reply to self
Steve Randy Waldman
@interfluidity.com

Once they do, of course, the work of the rich is to gin up interconfessional (racial/religious/ethnic/political party) division, to neutralize the possibility a democratic polity will insist no groups transition from luxury to domination of and disconnection from the polity by virtue of wealth. /fin

in reply to self