a bit ironic that it's the people making a world ever more dystopian who are most up-in-arms about the crisis of collapsing birth rates.
the default american attitude is "the government is fucking up and screwing us", so whoever is the government has to swim upstream hard to avoid becoming unpopular.
I think you're all great and I rarely have any trouble with any of you.
[tech notebook] Zero-ish overhead logging facade in Scala 3 https://tech.interfluidity.com/2025/05/26/zero-ish-overhead-logging-facade-in-scala-3/index.html
sometimes i'm not quite sure whether it is a grift or a scam.
You blame the government for making it more expensive while you raise your price in the name of compliance. Such a shame they are making it so expensive.
“I don't mean to be alarmist, but I do think it's time to start assuming everything you see online is fake.”
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
the Republicans will remind us that it’s much less racist to point out that children have small fingers when they bring iPhone assembly back to our shores.
except running for president, unfortunately.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
One thing Biden and Trump have in common is a BBB as their early signature legislative initiative, although they are very different BBBs.
(listening to the latest @ezraklein.bsky.social podcast; he starts with this observation!)
"A much more promising path to abundance than the one this book offers is to embrace a twenty-first-century New Deal. That is the tried-and-true model for a “liberalism that builds” in the United States" ~Sandeep Vaheesan // this really is an excellent piece.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
From a fantastic piece by @deanbaker13.bsky.social. (Thanks to David Brooks for provoking it!) A thing I'd add is that the welfare costs of people not getting treated because prices are too high may rival or even dwarf the financial cost of the patent monopoly. substack.com/home/post/p-...
Text: We will spend over $700 billion this year on prescription drugs and other pharmaceutical products. If these items were sold in a free market, without patent monopolies and other protections, we would likely pay close to $100 billion. The savings of $600 billion would be close to $5,000 for every household. But they won’t let you talk about this fact in the New York Times either.
mock the administration all you want, it is rather a remarkable achievement to render Harvard sympathetic. www.wonkette.com/p/kristi-noe...
Kristi Noem Shoots Harvard As Warning To Other Schools
Link Preview: Kristi Noem Shoots Harvard As Warning To Other Schools: We can't believe we're rooting for Harvard in this mess.a bit unfair to central planning. this administration does not plan.
Loading quoted Bluesky post...
[tech notebook] Scala 3 inline vs implicit ordering https://tech.interfluidity.com/2025/05/22/scala-3-inline-vs-implicit-ordering/index.html
what legal basis is supposed to distinguish the Fed from other erstwhile independent agencies with respect to Congressionally prohibited firings?
from @kevinerdmann.bsky.social kevinerdmann.substack.com/p/a-conversa... // a great piece from Kevin Erdmann. exclusive places are really boring, but we've so strangled the possibility of vibrant places that we compete to occupy the highest amenity mausoleums.
The problem of the last century of housing is that half the country is always below average, and we have frozen all of our neighborhoods in place in an attempt to get the lower half to live somewhere else. But the lower half still lives somewhere. So, now we have a lower half of the population, but not a lower half of housing stock that evolved to serve them.

