"It’s not that these people don’t know that an industrial-scale killing machine whirs just beyond their garden wall. They have simply learned to lead contented lives with ambient genocide." #NaomiKlein https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/14/the-zone-of-interest-auschwitz-gaza-genocide ht @hagbard @alanferrier
[tech notebook] tar or tgz? https://tech.interfluidity.com/2024/03/27/tar-or-tgz/index.html
i didn't even know Boeing made container ships.
moving from the King James to the King Donald edition. ht @GreenSkyOverMe https://mastodon.social/@indivisibleteam/112167844083854571
@phillmv "there's nothing better for a person's character than working a job."
From #AstraTaylor #LeahHuntHendrix https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/21/opinion/democracy-solidarity-trump.html

We can't have more immigrants. They're taking all of our kids' jobs!

Interchange (credit-card-swipe) "fees will go down from 2% to 1.96%. Booyah! In Europe swipe fees are capped at 0.3% and credit card companies have remained thriving and profitable. Draw your own conclusions." #KevinDrum https://jabberwocking.com/credit-card-companies-agree-to-lower-swipe-fees-by-0-04/
It'd be cool if there were a federated stack-exchange like infrastructure (very friendly to search and indexing).
“Approximately 2/3 of the initiating parties in cases going to arbitration are private equity-backed… These…have a strong incentive to add revenue to pay down debt quickly and…resources to pay administrative fees and argue their case. While some PE-backed firms credit the NSA with pushing them into bankruptcy, the data indicates that some large PE-backed provider groups are taking advantage of the arbitration system to extract high payments from insurers.” #LawsonMansell https://www.niskanencenter.org/the-no-surprises-act-is-protecting-patients-but-not-containing-health-care-costs/
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard that is painting with way too broad a brush. electoral reform is my core political aspiration at the moment, but imperfectly democratic municipalities really are imperfectly democratic, more legitimately and reliably than people who unilaterally declare the imperfections deficits and substitute their own views for what a “true” democracy would yield. 1/
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard (there’s no such thing as a true democracy. every means of aggregating of public preferences, values, interests shapes the outcome of that aggregation. there are some obvious kinds of defects i hope we all agree are illegitimate. but in general we have to defer to the procedures that are to get procedures we think are better, and it’s not legitimate to let opinion polls or such supervene.) /fin
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard NYC did provide universal pre-K. In US red states, localities try to do locally popular progressive things, and state govts shut them down. In blue states, localities try to do NIMBY things + states are increasingly find it necessary to supervene. Whether that's a "democratic deficit" becomes a complicated argument over differential enfranchisement and the views of different groups. (Is it just "old rich white ppl"?) It's arguably a democratic surfeit.
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard However a state organizes its governance, regulating the scale and provenance of market participants is within its legitimate purview. That might (perhaps US style) mean localities making choices, it might mean a national policy, it might mean a national policy of classifying places differently and applying different policies. All of those, and whatever choice are made, are legitimate (whether we think they are wise or unwise).
@luis_in_brief Thanks!
So, mastodon.social and other instances ought to get together and say we're defederating for now (or will defederate in 90 days, to be less disruptive), UNLESS threads supports actual migration as well as Mastodon (and any other reasonable asks).
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard Right. It's a debate in the UBI community. I'm sharply on the other side of it. "Basic" to me just means "base". To others it implies "covers basic costs where you live", which then implies adjustment. I support the former, pretty much oppose the latter.
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard Oh I know. It's a debate very much with two sides, and I am very, very familiar with both sides. If you think it's an easy question, the only easy answer is that you are wrong. But some localities may well choose to keep them out, and that's a perfectly legitimate choice, a navigation of trade-offs.
Maybe instead of an acrimonious should-we or shouldn't-we debate over federating with threads, instances should discuss and come to some consensus on terms threads would have to meet as a precondition to federation. Call it a union. I'd say migratability from threads to other instances would be one crucial prerequisite.
(I have no idea whether threads currently supports this.)
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard I favor UBI without regional adjustments. I'm interested in winning the support of broad publics, not local elites, which UBI does. Thinking about how programs politically survive the opposition of threatened elites is important, of course. It's also important to think about what's good in what is threatened and how one might preserve that. Maybe big-box chains aren't permitted to be drawn to compete for that now dispersed purchasing power.
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard Poland was just ruled by a near fascist political party for 8 years, and is now suffering the hangover that comes when liberal feel they have to resort to procedurally hardball means to uproot what near fascists entrenched, contributing to a risk of continuing polarizarion. In Romania, the fastest growing political party is neofash AUR.
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard The Baltics are great, in a way I think that belies your generalization about hinterland petite bourgeoisie. The Baltics have a high degree of local cohesion and control, which has yielded extraordinarily good governance, despite by rights being an EU hinterland. Localist outcomes (like density outcomes) depend a great deal on initial conditions. Good initial conditions get magnified, but so do bad.
@Alon @DiegoBeghin @MisuseCase @kentwillard I argue that we should think of UBI as place-based policy, because cost-of-living means a UBI equal in nominal terms is much more valuable in rural and exurban places. Like social security, it would leave places in some sense "less competitive" — less desperate people won't compete to wages as low — but I think that's a plus, not a minus, in welfare as well as social and political health.