is my perception unfair that, while all software has bugs and vulnerabilities, Microsoft software has a particularly bad history of enabling really catastrophic exfiltrations?

is that mostly a matter of its ubiquity, or is it genuinely more vulnerable on a per server basis than eg linux based systems?

given now decades of experience with both, if the differential vulnerability remains uncorrected, should we maybe make less use of the less secure technology? mastodon.social/@zackwhittaker