@scott who is endangering my freedom fries.
the enemy of your frenemy is what now?
just because you disagree with someone and their poast doesn't mean they are the person you want to spend a lot of fighting with and taking down. you have better targets than that. and the person whose post you dislike is with you against those better targets.
boxing without regulation is just beating. what is commerce without regulation?
there isn't anything in this world that is free to read. reading taxes readers' time and attention. it's a miracle they sometimes let themselves be taxed in money on top of that.
Freddie DeBoer says nice things about my sister's book. https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/2024-in-review
am i crippling my child's future life chances by discouraging narcissism and mendacity?
Organizing leadership by seniority is an important part of the incumbency bias of US Congressional elections.
Voters understandably choose representatives that will have influence over representatives who will not. Under seniority-based leadership rules, only incumbents have influence.
"I was just following market forces" is the new "I was just following orders"
assuming we are right (i'm pretty sure we are right!) that Dittman is Musk, i don't know what to do with an epistemological environment in which one of the world's most powerful men and most prominent speakers does this.
Screenshots of X posts by Elon Musk meming mockery of people who think Adrian Dittman is Elon Musk, quoting followers asserting believing this apparently true claim is false is an "IQ test", ie to be smart one must believe the lie.
This transaction has timed out and must be restarted.
the game was not fair but still you’ve been checkmated.
@buermann when you are hungry enough, even slop tastes good.
@inkican i hope so! god bless whoever they are.
can we (are we?) preemptively develop vaccines against H5N1 flu that would at least reduce its severity should it breakout as a human pandemic?
facebook began with a mission to connect the world and ends with a mission to dissolve all connections in slop.
fox news is not free speech.
it’s not fox news’ viewpoint that renders it not free speech. it is the intersection of viewpoint undisciplined by epistemological guard rails and reach. the bigger you are, the duller you must be, because you have obligations to fairness and caution.
note this is completely inconsistent with a world in which reach is a function of attracting eyeballs through entertainment or outrage.
if your requirements for a free society are inconsistent as a practical matter with its survival as a free society, you might want to reconsider those requirements.
people imagine that causality goes from free speech to a decent society, but it’s much more accurate to understand it as a decent society makes tenable free speech. 90s-era freewheeling speech norms were made tenable by shared epistemological institutions that were biased but broadly functional.
it’s how you get to live to 100. https://mas.to/@NunavutBirder/113739517177492647