what are the odds identities of confidential USAID funding recipients, named in classified files now accessed by 20-somethings with no vetting or counterintelligence training or legal authority, will evade professional intelligence activities of US adversaries? whose lives are in these kids’ hands?
Brad Setser makes an important point about trying to replace the US by reanchoring trade relationships around China.
It’s easy to buy from China, but what you wanted from the US was someone you could sell to.
https://vimeo.com/1052379677
#economics
@Phil when USAID funds democracy activism in Cuba, do you think there might be a reason for the names of the activists to be classified?
maybe USAID shouldn’t fund activities to which host governments object. that’s a policy call. but so far Congress has supported that sort of work. until they don’t, some documents really do need to be classified and remain secure.
“we apologize as we are busy assisting other constituents”
(from the message when you hit voicemail at Senator Rick Scott’s office)
Suppose you think USAID is more about official cover for intelligence work than aid. I think that’s exaggerated, untrue, but OK.
Then it is *more* outrageous its classified docs shld be compromised. Agents in the field don’t determine US intelligence policy but it is they whom these leaks may kill.
for whatever it’s worth, i just called my (MAGA) Congresswoman’s office to demand Elon Musk’s arrest and imprisonment for the flagrant lawbreaking this weekend with respect to USAID.
@Phil bureaucracy is the form of institution by which nearly all human action is coordinated at scale. every military is a bureaucracy. does that upset you?
article 1 of the Constitution creates Congress, before the executive, whose role is to put into practice the laws that Congress creates. the people exercise their authority by electing a legislature, not by electing a king.
your glory will become mass atrocity quite soon, if it is not nipped in the bud.
@_dm what’s happening at Treasury and USAID, the recission of the OMB memo but cagey language about what the EOs might still freeze, suggests to me an extraordinary degree of willingness to test the enforceability of the law.
@Phil no, it is not. we don’t elect a dictator. we elect a person whose duty is to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”. USAID is constructed by Congress, by law. Classification rules are the law, and the President has not declassified the documents people with no clearance have now accessed.
what agencies outside the executive branch of the Federal government are able to enforce Federal law?
suppose the courts, even the current Supreme Court, were to agree unilateral dismantling of an agency and unlawful access to classified documents are Federal crimes, if Trump doesn’t enforce the law can no one?
“Screwing around with Treasury payments and tariff walls is not just outrageous—it is like mixing a nice bleach-and-Drano cocktail. You wouldn’t describe that as ‘breaking mixology norms’, unless you were doing a goof.” @profmusgrave https://musgrave.substack.com/p/shredding-norms-is-cool
i’m always talking about thick scary tails i’m worried about but say the base case, the modal outcome, is we muddle through largely as we have.
i’m not sure that’s right any more.
somewhere in an attic there is a portrait of a head of lettuce rotting most floridly.
“One must be careful not to reify the clichés: just because everyone says it’s real doesn’t make it real. Or rather, it does, and that’s the problem.” #JohnGanz https://www.unpopularfront.news/p/vibes-cartel
“i will abuse you until you consent to marry me” may not be the flex they think.
besides maybe a handful of billionaires on an inauguration stage, is there anyone more pathetic than Congressional Republicans, who are watching their guy burn down the country but do nothing because what? they might have to face a competitive primary?
oh the poor poor dears.
@paninid i mean, they might not want to be pwned by a plaything of the Godless CCP.