it seems like the more the Harris campaign wins endorsement of high-profile ex-Republicans, the worse it does in the polls. hmmm.

@magicalthinking biologically i think they’d remain quite similar, they’d not evolve if life support was sufficient to ensure almost everybody lives through reproductive age, but yeah culturally linguistically etc i suspect we’d find them pretty weird. that stuff diverges very quickly.

“this is the new playbook for many on the right. They make provocative statements in hopes of generating objections, and then they cite those objections as proof that no one is allowed to have the conversation. I guess they think you're too stupid to see that the objections are themselves part of the conversation.” x.com/sethdillon/status/183259

@magicalthinking i mean a small number of people each generation cramped together experiencing similar lives under common governance over tens of thousands of years would become what we call “homogeneous” for sure.

@magicalthinking i’m a bit skeptical it would be that, um, fun. i mean, yeah everything would be recycled so cannibalism in that sense, but i doubt on the generation ship they just eat grandpa. i’m not sure why gender swapping would be adaptive, though i can see wanting technologies like cloning or artificial wombs. bug eating, well, even on Earth we’re likely to source protein that way, but i suspect it’ll mostly take shape as obscurely worded ingredients in processed foods.

@magicalthinking less hopeful when you put it that way…

sometimes i am hopeful they will finally discover Galt’s Gulch on Mars.

there was this guy who worked at Eli Lilly — his job was to come up with the science-ey but somehow catchy names they attach to their blockbuster drugs — and well, he had a crush on this coworker Alice, whenever he even saw her he got really turned on.

q: what do you call a teeny tiny sword fight?

a: a war of awl against awl.

@mister914 you think it’s fine that patents knowingly put firearms in the hands of kids, without supervising and controlling what they do with those firearms? i mean, yeah, the US is too carceral, but whatever the overall level, as misdeeds go, i’d put this pretty high on the list.

@ike we have to make gun owners’ properly liable first!

@admitsWrongIfProven i’m all for criminalizing unsafe storage of weapons, but often we don’t have visibility into people’s living rooms. when someone actually does get shot, i do hope we’ll criminalize what led to that as well.

“[T]oo much attention in the 1950s was paid to Democrats trying not to appear soft on communism, and too little attention to Republicans accepting most of the acquis of the New Deal in return for safety of private property.” glineq.blogspot.com/2024/09/th

Screenshot of text:

As Gerstle writes, too much attention in the 1950s was paid to Democrats trying not to appear soft on communism, and too little attention to Republicans accepting most of the acquis of the New Deal in return for safety of private property. (“The threat of international communism made possible the transition of the New Deal  from political movement to political order and ensured its dominance in American life for 30 years”, p. 46).

With the declining appeal of communism and then its eventual fall, there was much less need to acquiesce to labor’s demands. Labor had nowhere to go, or dream that it could go, or threaten to go. Reagan’s firing of thousands of air-controllers was the opening salvo of the war on labor. (Globalization and outsourcing to China might have been the second.) This argument is worth making, but is not new. Screenshot of text: As Gerstle writes, too much attention in the 1950s was paid to Democrats trying not to appear soft on communism, and too little attention to Republicans accepting most of the acquis of the New Deal in return for safety of private property. (“The threat of international communism made possible the transition of the New Deal from political movement to political order and ensured its dominance in American life for 30 years”, p. 46). With the declining appeal of communism and then its eventual fall, there was much less need to acquiesce to labor’s demands. Labor had nowhere to go, or dream that it could go, or threaten to go. Reagan’s firing of thousands of air-controllers was the opening salvo of the war on labor. (Globalization and outsourcing to China might have been the second.) This argument is worth making, but is not new.

“There are four types of mens rea, acting purposely, acting knowingly, acting recklessly, and acting negligently.” grievelaw.com/WICriminalProces

I wonder if really strict parental liability would be a form of gun control we could actually pass at a national level. Even red jurisdictions seem to be evolving their way towards it.

@stubby that sure would be nice!

@stubby (thanks for trying to help!)

in reply to self

@stubby Alas, H&R Block’s “Premium & Business” is also Windows only. Like TurboTax, they have desktop versions of their personal/sole-proprietorship softwares on Mac, but not if you operate a partnership/LLC/S-corp.

Screenshot of tech specs of H&R Block “Premium & Business” desktop tax prep product, showing a Windows-only requirement. Screenshot of tech specs of H&R Block “Premium & Business” desktop tax prep product, showing a Windows-only requirement.

@rieyin Yeah, but they make only their personal software available on Macs. Maybe it handles sole proprietership business income, but not partnerships/LLCs/S-corps. See TurboTax Business Desktop turbotax.intuit.com/small-busi

does anyone know any business tax software downloadable to the Mac (as opposed to online tax return production and filing services)?

TurboTax and TaxAct have downloadable business return software for Windows. (i used to buy Parallels and Windows just for TurboTax, but i really don’t want to.) i literally can’t find any similar products downloadable to a Mac.

Intuit (TurboTax), H&R Block, and TaxAct all have desktop small business tax prep software (meaning partnership/LLC/S-corp) downloadable for Windows, but not for Mac.

in reply to self

One thing I’ve learned the past few years is that judges—not the ideological justices of the Supreme Court, but ordinary judges—are chickenshit, afraid to disrupt status quo power even when clear precedent, ordinary legal reasoning, standard court procedure demand it. They make exceptions, reason with wild creativity, to avoid putting themselves in a hot seat. Examples include deferring Trump proceedings past the upcoming election, inverting the purpose of securities law to not blow-up crypto.