into what do your recreations recreate you?
i’m less interested in saving humanity than i am in saving the humans.
“sure, the Supreme Court is the final arbiter in interpreting the Constitution. but the President is the final arbiter in interpreting the Supreme Court!”
my body is operated by a homunculus who lives behind my third eye. but of course it needs to rest, so it has a staff of junior homunculi who take over.
anything my body does that seems bad was done by staff. i don’t know anything about it.
“a diverse Federal workforce should include both patriots *and* traitors.”
@gooser3000 sure. that the position should be much less powerful doesn’t mean impotence would be wise as a platform for aspirants. the position should still be much less powerful.
it should matter much less who the President is.
a problem with our electoral system is it elevates self-styled masters for jobs as servants.
i think i’m going to sign some Executive Orders.
i understand that my Executive Orders do not have the force of law. but do not question them.
Maybe active labor market policy, of a scale and vigor never before attempted, would actually be the panacea.
it’s a pretty square day:
5/5/25
5*5=25
Elon Musk is pulling up the very ladder he climbed to his perch. Gee, I wonder why you do that.
See @ryanlcooper https://prospect.org/environment/2025-05-05-doge-obliterating-american-industry/
one way to understand the moment we're in as "As Seen On TV". when TV was new, people did not understand how alien, how different, it was as a source of knowledge and information. they treated it with level of trust it did not deserve. so "seen on TV" constituted endorsement. 1/
we collectively learned that "seen on TV" could be bought or influenced, well beyond what was openly disclosed a ads or sponsorships, and "As Seen On TV" has faded to a kind of campy joke (even a way of imbuing products with camp). 2/
similarly, we collectively have not understood how different the internet and social media are from other media, have been caught of guard, are making dumb inferential mistakes. but maybe, like with television, we do eventually, collectively learn. 3/
of course, on TV and on the internet, the influencers and manipulators will be learning and changing too. maybe internet media evolve so fast we are destined to lose the cat and mouse game. 4/
maybe, but maybe not. we are changing our priors not just with respect to existing internet platforms, but also with respect to emerging media. that's a bit sad, to lose the sense of hope new media used to bring! but maybe it constrains media toward greater virtue. /fin
is localist left or right?
“french films” undermining our morals again.
we are all experiencing moral injury.
it’s not narcissism it’s just ordo amoris.
you read the news about the gears of the world, and it’s interesting. but never forget there’s somebody gettting crushed right now by the gears of the world, perhaps hundreds or thousands or millions of people. and it’s interesting. but as the gears turn it could be you or your loved ones crushed. and to everybody else it will still be interesting.
from "Trade Balances: It’s the Spending, Stupid" by @SteveRoth https://wealtheconomics.substack.com/p/trade-balances-its-the-spending-stupid
Text: Here’s the simple understanding to estimate US production from actual measured spending: • Tally up US total spending on new final goods and services. FSDP. • Subtract spending on goods and services that were not produced in the US. Imports. • Add other countries’ spending on goods that were produced in the US. Exports. You’re done.