A fascinating essay by #TannerGreer on Wang Huning as a kind of Chinese Tocqueville of the late 20th Century. Long but worth it. https://scholarstage.substack.com/p/american-nightmares ht #TylerCowen
(fixed broken link, thanks @marick)
Compare with #NSLyons, who frequently offers a much darker take on the views and role of Wang Huning, e.g. https://www.palladiummag.com/2021/10/11/the-triumph-and-terror-of-wang-huning/
to whom have you cozied up?
captchas are ripe for automation. https://gleasonator.com/objects/f2763f22-676e-49e1-b35b-4e30adad65fc
@anneroth under the standard logic of capitalism, high quality parenting needs to become a specialist occupation. it is too demanding for a hobby. it interferes too much with participation in the steep tournaments for wealth and status that now shape our lives.
there's no question that the United States has been a very devoted ally to Israel.
has Israel been a devoted ally to the United States?
it turns out i’m a git simpleton, but so many tips and tricks in this thread. https://social.jvns.ca/@b0rk/112178825295176036
Are you enjoying our content?
some senators are attempting to make the patent grift more grifty.
see #AlexMoss #TimiIwayemi https://prospect.org/power/2024-03-29-senators-latest-attempt-enrich-big-pharma/
There should be no illusions.
6.3%
true
(1 votes)
93.8%
false
(15 votes)
@travisfw for a variety of reasons, I don’t think ranked-choice / instant-runoff voting is a great system. i prefer it to the horrible status quo of plurality voting, of course, but i think it has a lot of problems. it’ll take a separate post to explain why. 1/
@travisfw but the thing that maintains the two-party system isn’t the “binary” lack of gradations of approval, but the spoiler effect. approval voting eliminates that. there is never a penalty for expressing your support of the party you most support, in addition (if necessary) to your “approval” of a party you support less, but do not wish to spoil. 2/
@travisfw in all deterministic voting systems, there is some benefit to strategic voting. in approval voting, you still have to think about who you don’t want to spoil. in RCV, you have to think strategically when your first and second choices have similar levels of support. (you can always opt out of thinking strategically, but then your vote may have undesirable effects.) 3/
@travisfw approval voting is a simpler and more predictable game, from a voter’s perspective, and strategic voting never requires you to misstate your preferences (since you cannot rank, you are never compelled to rank an option you like less over an option you like more to avoid a bad outcome). /fin
it is more engaging to just fight it out than it is to create the conditions under which we wouldn't have to fight.
the road to a wasteland is paved with high engagement.
[new draft post] How to understand approval voting https://drafts.interfluidity.com/2024/03/28/how-to-understand-approval-voting/index.html
@otfrom @Jgmeadows it's definitely a price of freedom, taking on various costs (and learning how to run your own things). like any costs, there may be contexts where it's unaffordable. but i can't for the life of me understand how so many well-funded projects tether themselves directly to AWS/Azure/Google APIs. or how standard and ubiquitous GitHub-specific tooling has become for testing and CI among firms capable of independence.
@otfrom @Jgmeadows (my own way of dealing with this stuff, for now, is to depend on cloud providers only for generic Linux servers, so that if one enshittifies there’s no lock-in, i can migrate. but if they collusively enshittify, if the “industry standard” becomes slop, i’ll still end up with nowhere to run.)
@otfrom @Jgmeadows the devils — and perhaps angels! — must live in the institutional details.
@davidtoddmccarty yup. i’m definitely a (fucking) mixed-economy-ist. 🙂
the cloud is just some profit-hungry one else’s computer, and if they can they will eventually prey upon you, no matter how nice and technically awesome they seem today. https://grimgreenfo.rest/notes/9rdle0uyo4d30029 ht @Jgmeadows
@davidtoddmccarty social democracy. finland, norway, sweden, denmark, and iceland. whether you think it is “capitalism” or “socialism” or whatever is irrelevant i think. i would consider deploying existing policy instruments like income taxes, and maybe new ones like wealth taxes, to compress the upside of the income and wealth distribution a bit more.