@marick @davenicolette@mastodon.social jinx.

@marick @davenicolette@mastodon.social i agree. i think what makes the point contestable is at the moment it's unclear how much those somewhat-successes might backslide. through the 1990s and early 2000s, we knew the direction of the arc of history but now it seems liable to epicycles.

@davenicolette@mastodon.social @marick we were able to constrain Jim Crow a bit, to shackle at least somewhat the worst elements of chattel illiberalism. i think often we can *hope* for more. we can create escapes for individuals that might eventually serve as useful feedback. but that is about as much as we can *expect* or *insist upon*, especially outside of our own borders.

(we did send troops to the US South, and i'd not write the enterprise off as complete failure, but complete success it was not either.)

@davenicolette@mastodon.social @marick with respect to the US South, though, I'd support a lot more insisting than outside the US. for example, we should absolutely end gerrymandering have have voting practices reviewable by the Federal government, as we did until the Roberts court decided equality was already at hand, so there was no need.

in reply to self

"Fittingly, this takes place in Judea…" jabberwocking.com/what-do-i-me

@BenRossTransit i'd contest the characterization "big part", though all my information is journalistic and anecdotal, as i suspect is yours (even if first-hand it might not be representative), so we'll not have any grounds to settle the dispute. nytimes.com/2024/04/26/opinion

the moral high ground is the only territory whose defense is sustainable.

“To even admit you are acting out of a perception of potential liability is thought in some circles to create a risk of liability. But this thinking in some cases creates enormous risk because the people who are articulating risk only think along one line of vulnerability, the one they understand—or because their logic is easily bent towards a pre-determined conclusion by ideologues prepared to manipulate it.” timothyburke.substack.com/p/ac

tired: what do you do for a living?

wired: what’s your grift?

@akkartik It’s a classic for sure!

[new draft post] Out of the spotlight drafts.interfluidity.com/2024/

@akkartik my automatic notification engine waits for it to be stable an hour! i last edited like 5 mins ago, and don't anticipate another read through, so... (thank you for your enthusiasm!)

@akkartik (i'm a big liar. i've reset the clock with a one-word change.)

in reply to self

i'm sorry i know this is meant in earnest and offensive but i just find it very funny.

from richardhanania.com/p/too-gay-t

Text:

there hasn’t been much attention focused on what it means for our elites to become so overwhelmingly gay. This is because we are in the earliest stages of this transformation, as LGBT identity among youth didn’t begin to skyrocket until the last decade or so. Thus, there hasn’t been enough time for this trend to remake society, though today’s college students are part of the gayest generation we have ever seen. Text: there hasn’t been much attention focused on what it means for our elites to become so overwhelmingly gay. This is because we are in the earliest stages of this transformation, as LGBT identity among youth didn’t begin to skyrocket until the last decade or so. Thus, there hasn’t been enough time for this trend to remake society, though today’s college students are part of the gayest generation we have ever seen.

@LesterB99 better to black queen.

[new draft post] The quality of what is coordinated drafts.interfluidity.com/2024/

@dangillmor merge the court interfluidity.com/v2/7964.html

cloud native? youtu.be/GpBFOJ3R0M4

@artcollisions no.

god save me from the people who claim to speak in my defense.

who knew a kind of contract called "noncompete agreements" might run afoul of a laws prohibiting anticompetitive behavior?

every day is a new surprise.

huge kudos to FTC for placing sanity above the reality distortion fields emitted by money and the people who hoard it.

see @pluralistic pluralistic.net/2024/04/25/cap

in general with media, the art isn't getting them to say what you want. the ones who are credible resist that, the ones who succumb smell like tankies.

the art is to let them say whatever they want, but to manage the topics they're talking about.

---
(lifted from a conversation with @Alon i thought it worth its own post)