“I wouldn’t completely write off a Harris win in the Electoral College even if Mr. Trump narrowly won the popular vote.” #NateCohn https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/25/upshot/poll-trump-harris-election.html ht #JoshBarro
// on the bright side, this would be the event that could rid of us of the electoral college.
maybe the LA Times and the Washington Post are part of a conspiracy to make The New York Times look good.
“yes,” said the boy who cried wolf. “but there were guard rails — i mean fences — around the village those times.”
“I’ve noticed a little linguistic tic in some recent public statements – the use of the word ‘ruthless’ as if it was a synonym for ‘diligent’ or ‘competent’.” @dsquareddigest https://backofmind.substack.com/p/ruthless-pragmatism
// kind of dark. reminds me of Kamala Harris’ choice to emphasize the word “lethal” when discussing the armed forces.
you’ve become a casualty of the war — in a sense, just a bit — if you find your initial reaction to news of soldiers’ deaths on the side that you dislike is unleavened by sadness or grief.
@carolannie they support taxing the rich more heavily. but they tend to justify that (like Bernie too!) in terms of “paying their fair share” to “finance government” (which is actually a bit incoherent, not totally wrong but has a lot of complicated nuances).
i don’t know of any center-left liberal who has averred publicly that certain extremes of wealth are simply incompatible with meaningful democracy, and we should tax to clip and then prevent those extremes. i hope i’ve just missed it!
Text: The ranger, Alex Sienkiewicz, had infuriated the ranchers by tearing down their “No Trespassing” signs. In the summer of 2016, he sent a staffwide email that read, “This is my regular reminder: NEVER ask permission to access the National Forest Service through a traditional route shown on our maps EVEN if that route crosses private land. NEVER ASK PERMISSION; NEVER SIGN IN.”
as billionaires buy media, bribe voters with “petitions”, finance dark money influence groups in order to buy a Supreme Court and now an election for a fascist, will center-left liberals finally concede that top inequality is a problem, that it’s not sufficient to just try to “raise the bottom”?
@artcollisions i think that’s right. there are economic efficiencies to scale, but political and social institutions really need a foundation at human scale. i think the unworldliness of this election has to do with the reduction of an activity with incredibly profound consequences to media spectacle that terminates with filling out a bureaucratic form. we’d be and act more sane if we actually got together to form and express our views.
@GuerillaOntologist reading the full piece, it doesn’t sound like they are all that much reformed.
@_dm gonna die with my keyboard in my hand *lawd lawd*
gonna die with my keyboard in my hand.
when throwing one scapegoat off the cliff doesn’t resolve the problem, well you need to find another scapegoat to throw off the cliff for that!
@curtosis i’ve really only ever been able to muster dipshit, in almost any activity i’ve tried…
@Transportist I think @mhs’s use of “inflection point” was right. It’s not that the anti-hero was unknown prior to 24. But it accelerated, became kind of the norm, during the edgy “golden age of television”.
(The Soprano’s also, also a bit earlier, I think. In general, maybe mafia tales were kind of a ghetto of popular anti-heroism before 9/11.)